On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:18 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:42 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:47 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Ok, how I take an M4 branch towards the end of next week, that gives a >>> > bit of time for everyone to make a bit of progress on what they're >>> > working on and still gives enough time to make sure M4 gets out before >>> > the end of the month. >>> > >>> > ...ant >>> > >>> >>> Can you give us some heads up one or two days before you cut the >>> branch. I want to try to avoid lots of merges if possible. >>> >>> >> >> What do people think about delaying M4 till later in next week to give a bit >> more time to complete more of the otest work? It seems like both the >> assembly and Java CAA otests are really close now so we may be able to get >> them all passing if we hold M4 till next week. >> >> ...ant >> >> > > Ok. I've create a 2.0-M4 JIRA category > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY/fixforversion/12314324 > and added JIRAs for the remaining things I'd like to see done in M4. > So far thats the 7 JIRAs (5 for SCA-J CAA tests and 2 for the JMS > binding), and theres also whatever is remaining for the Assembly > compliance tests to add to that. > > ...ant >
I don't think we should put off M4 any longer so I'm going to start on it tomorrow and try to get an RC out by the end of the week. Shout now if you've any big changes that you'd like to get in before I do this. ...ant
