> > I shall talk to you off list and help you working on resolving the > issues relating to this but if we don't fix those shortly then I'd > like to reopen and put back the work around for TUSCANY-3480 as it > gets all the assembly and Java CAA tests passing so we could then add > those test suites to the build, which is vastly more important IMHO > than arguing about root causes of one particular problem. > > ...ant >
Am walking through the issues and any help is very much appreciated I agree that it's important to get the tests in the build. I disagree that the way to do that is by commenting out parts of the runtime. If we are to run with tests disabled then I would prefer that we adopt an approach to disabling specific tests against which we can log open JIRA numbers. For example, we could widen the feature you added to the bridge to * out error tests that don't work. If this suits I will undertake to ask OASIS to give us similar control over the outcome of all tests (not just tests that are expected to report an error). Simon
