On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:36 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I shall talk to you off list and help you working on resolving the >> issues relating to this but if we don't fix those shortly then I'd >> like to reopen and put back the work around for TUSCANY-3480 as it >> gets all the assembly and Java CAA tests passing so we could then add >> those test suites to the build, which is vastly more important IMHO >> than arguing about root causes of one particular problem. >> >> ...ant >> > > Am walking through the issues and any help is very much appreciated > I agree that it's important to get the tests in the build. > I disagree that the way to do that is by commenting out parts of the runtime.
Commenting out this particular bit of code doesn't break a single existing Tuscany test and as you've said the code isn't even working completely yet so really it shouldn't be activated until it doesn't break other not directly related compliance tests. ...ant
