On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: > The following ones should have been fixed now: > >> Apache Tuscany SCA iTest Nodes binding.sca Using Hazelcast Registry >> Apache Tuscany SCA iTest Nodes binding.sca Using Tribes Registry >> Apache Tuscany SCA iTest Builder Recusive Multi-Level > > Thanks, > Raymond > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Luciano Resende" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:11 AM > To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: OASIS Schema Updates > >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:03 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Some regressions! There are 235 new fails in the otests and a whole >>> bunch of fails in the Tuscany samples and itest, so anyone with local >>> changes has no way of knowing if they're breaking anything now. What >>> sort of time frame are you looking at for fixing these? >>> >>> ...ant >>> >> >> The only Tuscany failures I'm seeing are : >> Apache Tuscany SCA iTest JMS Message Format jmstextxmlinjmsobjectout >> Apache Tuscany SCA iTest JMS Tests For Selectors >> Apache Tuscany SCA iTest Nodes binding.sca Using Hazelcast Registry >> Apache Tuscany SCA iTest Nodes binding.sca Using Tribes Registry >> Apache Tuscany SCA iTest Builder Recusive Multi-Level >> >> and I don't see any sample failures. >> >> As for the oTests, i believe a lot of changes are related to reference >> multiplicity and some sequence changes ... but I need Mike or someone >> from OASIS to provide those changes. >> >> -- >> Luciano Resende >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
I'm seeing the same list as Luciano. I think we should follow Ant's suggestion and make local changes.I don't think we'll get OASIS changes before next week. Anything I can do to help? Simon
