On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > I notice that the KEYS file we advertise on the 1.x and 2.x downloads > pages [1] does not match the KEYS file we have in svn [2] > > > [1] http://www.apache.org/dist/tuscany/KEYS > > Jeremy Boynes > Kelvin Goodson > Andrew Borley > Raymond Feng > Ant Elder > S Venkatakrishnan > Luciano Resende > Simon Laws > Ramkumar Ramalingam > > [2] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/KEYS > > Jeremy Boynes > Kelvin Goodson > Andrew Borley > Raymond Feng > Ant Elder > S Venkatakrishnan > Luciano Resende > Simon Laws > *Amita Vadhavkar > Ramkumar Ramalingam > *Simon Christopher Nash > > > There are two extra entries in [2] (marked *) when compared to [1]. > The easy answer is to copy [2] to [1]. However if this is going to be > a problem in the future do we really need to maintain [1]? >
The file at [1] is required as there are automated scripts that regularly scan the distribution area to verify that all the distributed files are correctly signed. The copy at [2] could probably go, Amita never did end up doing a release so her key isn't really needed. ...ant
