On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The file at [1] is required as there are automated scripts that >> regularly scan the distribution area to verify that all the >> distributed files are correctly signed. > > hmmm ok, > >> The copy at [2] could probably >> go, Amita never did end up doing a release so her key isn't really >> needed. > > I don't have a problem with leaving Amita's key there it just feels > awkward having the file in two places. Having said getting rid of the > change tracked version also doesn't seem ideal. Maybe I could create a > little synch script that runs now and again to keep the two in step > like we do with the web site Anyone think that sounds problematic? >
Can't we have a checkout of KEYS file from SVN to dist ? Or a checkout somewhere, and make a link (ln -s) ? -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
