On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> The file at [1] is required as there are automated scripts that >>> regularly scan the distribution area to verify that all the >>> distributed files are correctly signed. >> >> hmmm ok, >> >>> The copy at [2] could probably >>> go, Amita never did end up doing a release so her key isn't really >>> needed. >> >> I don't have a problem with leaving Amita's key there it just feels >> awkward having the file in two places. Having said getting rid of the >> change tracked version also doesn't seem ideal. Maybe I could create a >> little synch script that runs now and again to keep the two in step >> like we do with the web site Anyone think that sounds problematic? >> > > Can't we have a checkout of KEYS file from SVN to dist ? Or a checkout > somewhere, and make a link (ln -s) ? > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
yep, I was looking at (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/site/trunk/bin/sync) and that's the kind of thing that seems to do. Still needs to be run regularly. Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
