I have read all the README files, etc in the Implementation Spring and I think I understand the particularity of the extension, but what I couldn't figure out is why the module naming is not following the same convention we follow for all other modules (e.g implementation-xxx, implementation-xxx-runtime)... Does anyone have more details on this ?
-- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
