On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: >> I have read all the README files, etc in the Implementation Spring and >> I think I understand the particularity of the extension, but what I >> couldn't figure out is why the module naming is not following the same >> convention we follow for all other modules (e.g implementation-xxx, >> implementation-xxx-runtime)... Does anyone have more details on this ? >> >> -- >> Luciano Resende >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >> > > Hi Luciano > > Don't know. Ram made the change but svn comment doesn't say why. I > note that the READMEs in both implementation-spring and > implementation-spring-sca still refer to > implementation-spring-runtime. We had implementation-spring-runtime in > 1.x. >
+1 for renaming it to implementation-spring-runtime. There was some debate about this when the original names were done during the work to isolate all the spring method calls, 1.x did get renamed to implementation-spring-runtime but it never ended up getting done for 2.x. ...ant
