On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: > I have read all the README files, etc in the Implementation Spring and > I think I understand the particularity of the extension, but what I > couldn't figure out is why the module naming is not following the same > convention we follow for all other modules (e.g implementation-xxx, > implementation-xxx-runtime)... Does anyone have more details on this ? > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
Hi Luciano Don't know. Ram made the change but svn comment doesn't say why. I note that the READMEs in both implementation-spring and implementation-spring-sca still refer to implementation-spring-runtime. We had implementation-spring-runtime in 1.x. Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
