Simon,
More comments on the ASM testcases
Simon Laws wrote:
Morning folks. Just back off vacation so thought I would re-run the
otests to get a feel for the current state of play. I've posted what I
see below. From the recent comments on this thread I assume that at
least some of these new failures are related to either stricter policy
checking of new spec features. I'll have a crack at matching the
previous failure comments against this list. If someone already has
the list let me know.
Assembly
========
Results :
Failed tests:
testDummy(client.ASM_5044_TestCase)
testDummy(client.ASM_8005_TestCase)
testDummy(client.ASM_12007_TestCase)
testDummy(client.ASM_10002_TestCase)
testDummy(client.ASM_10003_TestCase)
testDummy(client.ASM_12008_TestCase)
testDummy(client.ASM_5043_TestCase)
testDummy(client.ASM_8017_TestCase)
testDummy(client.ASM_8018_TestCase)
Tests run: 134, Failures: 9, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
ASM_8005 & ASM_8017 run clean for me. What problems do you see?
ASM_8018 fails for me because the error message from Tuscany has been changed, so in this case the
error properties file needs updating - I'll do that next.
Yours, Mike.
