On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Mike Edwards > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Simon, >> >> More comments on the ASM testcases >> >> Simon Laws wrote: >>> >>> Morning folks. Just back off vacation so thought I would re-run the >>> otests to get a feel for the current state of play. I've posted what I >>> see below. From the recent comments on this thread I assume that at >>> least some of these new failures are related to either stricter policy >>> checking of new spec features. I'll have a crack at matching the >>> previous failure comments against this list. If someone already has >>> the list let me know. >>> >>> >>> Assembly >>> ======== >>> >>> Results : >>> >>> Failed tests: >>> testDummy(client.ASM_5044_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_8005_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_12007_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_10002_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_10003_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_12008_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_5043_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_8017_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_8018_TestCase) >>> >>> Tests run: 134, Failures: 9, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 >>> >> >> >> ASM_8005 & ASM_8017 run clean for me. What problems do you see? >> >> ASM_8018 fails for me because the error message from Tuscany has been >> changed, so in this case the error properties file needs updating - I'll do >> that next. >> >> >> Yours, Mike. >> > > ASM_8005 & ASM_8017 fail for me as a subsequent builder problem is > hiding the required error message. > > Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException > at > org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.xml.CompositeProcessor.write(CompositeProcessor.java:931) > > Simon > -- > Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org > Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com >
And ASM_8018 is the same as 5 and 17. 12007, 12008, 1003 are failing because the format of the error messages that Tuscany is now generating 10002 is failing due to an unresolved intent so I probably to do with tighter policy checking. I'll start by looking at the builder issue affecting 5, 17 and 18. Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
