On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:53 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > Totally agree with that. We should be trying hard to make trunk as small, > quick and easy to build as possible so should put stuff thats deemed not > quite ready yet somewhere else. If something isn't ready to be released or > build by the Hudson nightly build why should everybody else in the world > who's trying to build Tuscany have to try to check it out, build it, and get > all the extra dependencies.
Well, I guess couple of the community members like the ability to include these modules as part of their development environment (e.g. ability to generate IDE files as source dependencies, and have an option to build together with other modules). Downloading these extra sources will not really cause side effects to other developers, unless they have to build it as part of the main profile, and from my previous post, I was kind suggesting that, as long as the things that are being brought up are built somewhere (e.g. Hudson), I'm fine with this... > The sandbox or contrib area outside of trunk > seem much more appropriate places to put not yet ready things. Now you got me totally confused... I have seen multiple e-mails from you asking people to develop in trunk [1], but now you are suggesting we go do development out of trunk ? Could you please clarify ? [1] http://markmail.org/message/nfizqwiviwsem5mi -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
