i agree with the "thread spawning" :P issue mentioned by Luciano. In my opinion a wiki page will rapidly get ignored/out-dated so I can try and start new mail threads on each concerning issue i can extract out of the latest big disscusions we had (let's say > 20 replies). Given the time difference and the fact that i'm not contributing any code at the moment, I'd be happy to help with that.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]>wrote: > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:36 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Florian MOGA <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> distribution sounds good to me... > >> > > > > In the distribution folder we already have "all" and "tomcat". What > > directory should we use to collect together the projects that describe > > collections of jars but which are not, in their own right, > > distributions, e.g. core-runtime, base-runtime etc. > > > > Do we think distribution which is assembling set of jars in a given > structure to be consumed by users feat well together with "soft > grouping" of modules for simplifying consumption ? By bringing all of > this together inside distribution, it might have potential to confuse > people. > > Anyway, this thread is getting really complicated to follow, should we > have a wiki page with proposed changes and get it updated with > proposed changes ? > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
