I've spent this morning on reading our latest discussions in order to identify what was left out on the way. I'll be starting new threads for each topic in a moment.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:06 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > Hasn't most of the work been done now, and all thats left is how to > group the shades, features and distribution folders, is there anything > else? For those I think it would be fine to initially just move > features and shades to be under distribution, that way the trunk top > level is about as clean as its going to get and we can try moving > about things in distribution/ as we go and people are less likely to > mind about whats going on in there. > > ...ant > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Florian MOGA <[email protected]> wrote: > > i agree with the "thread spawning" :P issue mentioned by Luciano. In my > > opinion a wiki page will rapidly get ignored/out-dated so I can try and > > start new mail threads on each concerning issue i can extract out of the > > latest big disscusions we had (let's say > 20 replies). Given the time > > difference and the fact that i'm not contributing any code at the moment, > > I'd be happy to help with that. > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:36 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Florian MOGA <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> >> distribution sounds good to me... > >> >> > >> > > >> > In the distribution folder we already have "all" and "tomcat". What > >> > directory should we use to collect together the projects that describe > >> > collections of jars but which are not, in their own right, > >> > distributions, e.g. core-runtime, base-runtime etc. > >> > > >> > >> Do we think distribution which is assembling set of jars in a given > >> structure to be consumed by users feat well together with "soft > >> grouping" of modules for simplifying consumption ? By bringing all of > >> this together inside distribution, it might have potential to confuse > >> people. > >> > >> Anyway, this thread is getting really complicated to follow, should we > >> have a wiki page with proposed changes and get it updated with > >> proposed changes ? > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Luciano Resende > >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende > >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > >
