On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Raymond Feng <enjoyj...@gmail.com> wrote: > IMO, we shouldn't even try to use one "consistent" way to launch Tuscany in > the samples. I don't like the magic plugin approach. The whole idea of > Tuscany/SCA is to adapt to whatever technology/container people use instead > of reinventing the wheels. Think about Spring, there is no mandatory way to > use it. >
Last time i looked Spring did have a single consistent set of jars to use, and no pom type ones. Surely it will be easier for our users if there are a single set of jars we document that they should use? ...ant