On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 3:12 PM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Raymond Feng <enjoyj...@gmail.com> wrote: >> IMO, we shouldn't even try to use one "consistent" way to launch Tuscany in >> the samples. I don't like the magic plugin approach. The whole idea of >> Tuscany/SCA is to adapt to whatever technology/container people use instead >> of reinventing the wheels. Think about Spring, there is no mandatory way to >> use it. >> > > Last time i looked Spring did have a single consistent set of jars to > use, and no pom type ones. Surely it will be easier for our users if > there are a single set of jars we document that they should use? > > ...ant >
I believe Raymond's remarks were not related to a single consistent set of jars or pom, but that Spring would allow you to launch Spring based applications in multiple ways based on ways that users are using these apps in real deployments, and that it does not provide a spring specific way to run these applications. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
