ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Simon Nash <n...@apache.org> wrote:
Also in [1], I said that a new sample that doesn't yet meet the mandatory
release requirements should go in unreleased/ initially. AFAICT, the store
sample does meet the mandatory release requirements, so I'm not sure why
it was moved to unreleased/.
Because without asking first there is no way of know if there is
consensus with everyone to include something in trunk. I give up on
this new approach to the samples, it is sucking away way to much time.
Please from now on lets go back to trunk/samples working just the same
as any other part of tuscany svn.
...ant
I think the process should work the other way round, i.e., that if
a sample is committed to trunk and it doesn't meet the mandatory
requirements (which we can discuss and hopefully agree), then it should
be moved to unreleased/ until it does meet the mandatory requirements.
Is this a workable approach?
Simon
