We have filed a CCLA and ICLAs for all committers. The CCLA lists "code and documentation for Twill" in schedule B. So this should be sufficient?
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Gary. There need to be iclas and cclas covering everyone who is a > committer. You should also file a code grant unless you addressed that > as part of the ccla (see schedule B in the ccla) > > Patrick > > On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Gary Helmling <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > 3. How long does it normally take to get IP clearance? Should we > >> target > >> > that for the next period? > >> > > >> > >> First step in IP clearance has been completed already by accepting Twill > >> into the incubator. > >> Are there any other contributors to Weave/Twill than the initial > >> committers? If yes, ICLAs are needed. If no, then this should pretty > much > >> be it. > >> > >> > >> > > Looking through the Weave commit history, I see one external pull request > > that was merged: > > > > commit 49463afb15bd24d3c3356fd99e70cf0212e8f40f > > Author: tzolov <[email protected]> > > Date: Thu May 23 14:23:53 2013 +0200 > > > > (WEAVE-13) rename AbstractWeaveRunnable to WeaveRunnable when > > appropriate > > > > > > But the contributor (Christian Tzolov) is an Apache Crunch committer and > > PMC member (see http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#T), so > > already has an ICLA on file. > > > > All other contributors to Weave/Twill up to incubation have been > > Continuuity employees making contributions as part of their work. So > would > > the Corp CLA cover them, or do we also need ICLAs from everyone who > > committed to the project? >
