afaik when you get the receipt back you're good. Patrick
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Andreas Neumann <[email protected]> wrote: > We have filed a CCLA and ICLAs for all committers. > The CCLA lists "code and documentation for Twill" in schedule B. > So this should be sufficient? > > > On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Gary. There need to be iclas and cclas covering everyone who is a >> committer. You should also file a code grant unless you addressed that >> as part of the ccla (see schedule B in the ccla) >> >> Patrick >> >> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Gary Helmling <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > 3. How long does it normally take to get IP clearance? Should we >> >> target >> >> > that for the next period? >> >> > >> >> >> >> First step in IP clearance has been completed already by accepting Twill >> >> into the incubator. >> >> Are there any other contributors to Weave/Twill than the initial >> >> committers? If yes, ICLAs are needed. If no, then this should pretty >> much >> >> be it. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Looking through the Weave commit history, I see one external pull request >> > that was merged: >> > >> > commit 49463afb15bd24d3c3356fd99e70cf0212e8f40f >> > Author: tzolov <[email protected]> >> > Date: Thu May 23 14:23:53 2013 +0200 >> > >> > (WEAVE-13) rename AbstractWeaveRunnable to WeaveRunnable when >> > appropriate >> > >> > >> > But the contributor (Christian Tzolov) is an Apache Crunch committer and >> > PMC member (see http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#T), so >> > already has an ICLA on file. >> > >> > All other contributors to Weave/Twill up to incubation have been >> > Continuuity employees making contributions as part of their work. So >> would >> > the Corp CLA cover them, or do we also need ICLAs from everyone who >> > committed to the project? >>
