Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At least in theory an unlimited (in the sense of programming language > constructs etc.) parser generator, as yacc, should be better than a > limited one, as boost::spirit. > In which way do you think spirit is limited? The semantic actions available there could implement just about every conceivable context-sensitive grammar.
> Reaching the point where the parser becomes the main bottleneck, we > should try out independent implementations, using boost::spirit and > bison/yacc. Personally, I am a fan of domain oriented prog. languages > and therefor would favor bison. > According to other people, spirit _is_ a DSEL (domain-specific embedded language) - when given the choice, I prefer embedded DSLs over external ones. :-) Cheers, -- Thorsten If you're not failing some of the time, you're not trying hard enough. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
