On Mon, September 26, 2005 13:09, Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi Thorsten, > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 23:18:24 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > >> hm. I'd profile a larger test case beforehand - spirit is a recursive >> parser vs. yacc being table-driven. > > A valid concern. IMHO yacc _will_ be faster anyway, the question is just > how much, and whether spirit would be suitable at all. And whether > developing yet another parser is worth it. As there are many XML > parsers already available, what about eXpat, for example?
The logical XML parser to use would be libxml, since that's the parser Gnome uses and Solaris & Linux desktops are often Gnome + OO.o. -- Nicolas Mailhot --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
