Hi Peter, I haven't been following too closely, so I apologize if I missed something you've said earlier - but can you say what the "legal" issues are that you are concerned about?
-Marshall On 11/9/2012 12:10 PM, Peter Klügl (JIRA) wrote: > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13494124#comment-13494124 > ] > > Peter Klügl commented on UIMA-2475: > ----------------------------------- > > Ok, I did that now. The resulting project is not nice, but seems to work. > However, I did not have the time yet to test it with a Tycho project. > > I do not want to commit my changes right now (-> UIMA-AS), and the project is > too big to attach it here, because of the shipped plugins. > > Marshall, is there any other legal way to provide the code/build? > > >> eclipse p2 update site instead of old-style update site >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Key: UIMA-2475 >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2475 >> Project: UIMA >> Issue Type: Bug >> Components: Eclipse plugins >> Reporter: Steven Bethard >> Assignee: Peter Klügl >> Attachments: uimaj-eclipse-update-site.zip >> >> >> The UIMA Eclipse update site (www.apache.org/dist/uima/eclipse-update-site) >> is an Eclipse 3.3 (or older) update site. Since Eclipse 3.4, the recommended >> update site layout is p2: >> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox_p2_Getting_Started_for_Releng#Why_should_I_make_changes_to_adopt_p2.3F >> I've been bitten by this update site issue because old-style update sites >> make it impossible to resolve build-time dependencies when building Eclipse >> plugins: >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=380438#c3 >> Could the UIMA update site be modernized to the p2 layout? > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira >
