Am 12.12.2012 um 14:10 schrieb Peter Klügl <[email protected]>: > On 12.12.2012 13:57, Jörn Kottmann wrote: >> On 12/12/2012 01:53 PM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>> Thanks for the answers. >>> >>> The next question: What about the version number of the TextMarker release? >>> >> >> If you align with the UIMA releases you are somehow bound to its development >> cycle, in >> case you want to release more frequently this could be problematic. >> > > Yes, at least for the beginning this can be problematic. However, I do not > know if it is better to start with 1.0.0 or even 0.1.0. > > Is there a possibility for releases with sub-versions or additional build > numbers? Then again, the more frequent releases would be especially of the > type "maintenance", which corresponds to the third digit.
You could also want to make minor or major releases independent from the UIMA release cycle, e.g. when you introduce new features, change the script grammar or do other potentially incompatible changes (e.g. fully qualified type names and aliases for them? ;) ). -- Richard -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Richard Eckart de Castilho Technical Lead Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing Lab (UKP-TUD) FB 20 Computer Science Department Technische Universität Darmstadt Hochschulstr. 10, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany phone [+49] (0)6151 16-7477, fax -5455, room S2/02/B117 [email protected] www.ukp.tu-darmstadt.de Web Research at TU Darmstadt (WeRC) www.werc.tu-darmstadt.de -------------------------------------------------------------------
