>> You could also want to make minor or major releases independent from the 
>> UIMA release cycle, e.g. when you introduce new features, change the script 
>> grammar or do other potentially incompatible changes (e.g. fully qualified 
>> type names and aliases for them? ;) ).
> 
> Yes, I agree.
> 
> What about the version numbers of uimafit? Do they remain the same (1.5.0)?
> 
> …btw... after uimafit completely arrived, we need to talk about how 
> TextMarker can interact better with the uimafit concepts :-)

I'd rather tend towards a 2.0.0 since all the package names and stuff will 
change. It's going to be interesting if and what kind of backwards 
compatibility can be provided. I have yet to dive down into the dirty details.

-- Richard

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Richard Eckart de Castilho
Technical Lead
Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing Lab (UKP-TUD) 
FB 20 Computer Science Department      
Technische Universität Darmstadt 
Hochschulstr. 10, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany 
phone [+49] (0)6151 16-7477, fax -5455, room S2/02/B117
[email protected] 
www.ukp.tu-darmstadt.de 
Web Research at TU Darmstadt (WeRC) www.werc.tu-darmstadt.de
------------------------------------------------------------------- 






Reply via email to