I did not care too much about good release cycles/versioning. It was
just 1.0.0.qualifier.
I already broke with backwards compability straightaway, so I have no
problem to start with a completely new version number.
Peter
On 12.12.2012 14:40, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
What was the version of your last non-Apache release?
Jörn
On 12/12/2012 02:38 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
You could also want to make minor or major releases independent
from the UIMA release cycle, e.g. when you introduce new features,
change the script grammar or do other potentially incompatible
changes (e.g. fully qualified type names and aliases for them? ;) ).
Yes, I agree.
What about the version numbers of uimafit? Do they remain the same
(1.5.0)?
…btw... after uimafit completely arrived, we need to talk about how
TextMarker can interact better with the uimafit concepts :-)
I'd rather tend towards a 2.0.0 since all the package names and stuff
will change. It's going to be interesting if and what kind of
backwards compatibility can be provided. I have yet to dive down into
the dirty details.
-- Richard
