Am 29.01.2013 20:25, schrieb Marshall Schor:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/TextMarker-2.0.0-rc2/src_bin/
directory,
there are multiple files where the version is missing, and instead is the
literal string ${parseVersion.osgiVersion}.
I already observed this in RC1, but I have not investigated this
problem, because it also happens for the other uima plugins, e.g.,
uimaj-ep-cas-editor
I think these need to be fixed - so the version is included in the released file
name.
Also, what is the purpose of this whole directory? I think perhaps all of the
"jars" having compiled classed and their associated signatures/checksum files
can be deleted? My Reasoning:
Yes. My reason for providing all those files was the fact that those
files are uploaded to the staging repository. I read something that
these files should also be provided in the webspace in order to
facilitate the reviewing.
If those poms are not needed, then there is maybe no problem so solve.
these Jars are for the convenience of users. But users won't be using them via
this path. They'll either be using them via Eclipse update site, or (less
likely?) via pulling them as dependencies from Maven Central.
I must admit that I already wondered how and in which form TextMarker
will be released. There is the update site for the workbench, of course.
However, there are maybe some people (maybe in Richards group) that are
using TextMarker rules directly in some maven-built projects, without
the Workbench, only adding some maven dependency. Even users of the
workbench will eventually integrate the developed analysis engines in
some applications that are maybe built with maven. Then, there should
maybe also be the option to download all binaries (uima-textmarker.jar
and the plugins), similar to the uimaj release. If not, then non-maven
developers have to get/download somehow the update site and add the
engine plugin as an library.
So, there's no need to include them here, I think.
Should I remove them for the next RC? I just added as much as possible
in order to not forget anything.
Best,
Peter
-Marshall
On 1/28/2013 8:58 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
Hi,
the second release candidate of the sandbox project Apache UIMA TextMarker is
ready for voting. This vote also includes our new composite repository.
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-183/
SVN tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/TextMarker/tags/uimaj-textmarker-parent-2.0.0-rc2
Archive with all sources:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/TextMarker-2.0.0-rc2/uimaj-textmarker-parent-2.0.0-source-release.zip
Composite repository with three update sites: uimaj, uima-as and
uima-textmarker-2.0.0:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/TextMarker-2.0.0-rc2/eclipse-update-site
Binaries and sources:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/TextMarker-2.0.0-rc2/src_bin
The issues fixed are in the RELEASE_NOTES.html in the src/bin packages.
They can also be found here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0TextMarker%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20TextMarker%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
Documentation (pdf file):
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/TextMarker-2.0.0-rc2/tools.textmarker.book.pdf
Please vote on release:
[ ] +1 OK to release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
Thanks.
Peter
