The README for duccling says it contains "source and test code" ... but I think there's only source code?
It would be good for the README to also say what to do with this, or to give a pointer to the install documentation that describes what to do with it, and to say something like: As part of running the post-install script, this code will be compiled on the target system(s) where ducc is being installed, (or whatever is true :-) ). -Marshall On 11/20/2013 2:22 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: > I've started to do some preliminary review of the DUCC, in preparation for its > release. > > A scan of the code for the phrase "GPL" turns up some things: > > Maven detects there's some dependencies on JAXB in the project duccdocs, > (which > seems unusual?), and finds that JAXB is a dependency (??) which is dual > licensed > under CDDL and GPL. Does duccdocs really need to have a dependency on JAXB? > > DataTables-1.9.1 has a 3rd version of jquery.js which includes Sizzle.js > licensed under the MIT, BSD, GPL. I think this probably means "triple > licensed" > but I guess it could mean that all of them might apply to different parts? If > you look at the current Sizzle.js it is only licensed under the MIT license. > > The jquery.js file is in the source svn 6 times, at multiple (3 or more) > versions. Is this desired? > > -Marshall > > >
