The docs say this is accessed at port 42133. Is this configurable? ------
The docs mention two display modes: scroll mode and classic mode. The website has "Table Style" for scroll/classic. Is Table Style the same as "Display Modes"? ------ A recent version of the ducc webserver I tried (not sure if it's the identical-to-trunk level), had some issues: In Google Chrome browser, switching to Scroll mode made the header row have column widths that were much wider than the rest of the data in the table, so they didn't line up (even after trying both kinds of "reloading"); Firefox didn't have this issue. Is there a "recommended/required" browser people need to use? Another issue was (in Firefox) the header columns don't re-size (in scroll mode) when you change the browser width, even after refreshing with the "refresh" button in the web page (but they do resize if you use firefox's own refresh button). After picking a sort index, the direction arrows become very hard to see on that column (the color / size makes it hard to see them). There's no apparant way to "undo" the sort picking; you can sort on another column, of course. (And, I discovered that if you do a firefox-refresh (not the special in-the-page refresh button), it seems to undo the sort - not sure this is working as designed though). Is any kind of multi-column sorting supported? If I sort on one column, and then pick on another column as the sort key, do items that have now have the same sort key value, retain the ordering they had before the resort? -Marshall On 11/20/2013 2:22 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: > I've started to do some preliminary review of the DUCC, in preparation for its > release. > > A scan of the code for the phrase "GPL" turns up some things: > > Maven detects there's some dependencies on JAXB in the project duccdocs, > (which > seems unusual?), and finds that JAXB is a dependency (??) which is dual > licensed > under CDDL and GPL. Does duccdocs really need to have a dependency on JAXB? > > DataTables-1.9.1 has a 3rd version of jquery.js which includes Sizzle.js > licensed under the MIT, BSD, GPL. I think this probably means "triple > licensed" > but I guess it could mean that all of them might apply to different parts? If > you look at the current Sizzle.js it is only licensed under the MIT license. > > The jquery.js file is in the source svn 6 times, at multiple (3 or more) > versions. Is this desired? > > -Marshall > > >
