I know we already have talked about the strategy of the required java version, but I think I have seen that ducc depends on java 6.
I would like to move ruta also to java 6 since I could really need some methods only available in java 6. Opinions? Peter Am 10.01.2014 12:29, schrieb Peter Klügl: > Btw, Martin volunteered as release manager for the upcoming ruta release > if nobody objects. > > Peter > > Am 07.01.2014 19:08, schrieb Martin Toepfer: >> +1 for "2.2.0" because there will be several improvements in the next >> release. >> >>> Martin >>> +1 for 2nd digit. Last digit be minor features and bug fixes. >>> >>> I usually update the 2nd digit by default when I do >>> releases and reserve the last digit for shoving in intermediate >>> maintenance revisions of the last release. >>> >>> -- Richard >>> >>> On 07.01.2014, at 13:17, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 to having the 2nd digit increment if there are more than minor >>>> changes, >>>> especially if some of those changes might require some user action. >>>> >>>> -Marshall >>>> On 1/7/2014 5:13 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I wonder if the next version should be 2.2.0 instead of 2.1.1 since >>>>> the >>>>> new import syntax and functionality is not a small change and the >>>>> improvements in UIMA-2332 will maybe have a obvious impact for the >>>>> users. >>>>> >>>>> Any opinions? >>>>> >>>>> Peter
