I'll keep my eyes opened ;-) Peter already told me that the release
process may take some time.
-- Martin
Am 10.01.2014 16:56, schrieb Marshall Schor:
On 1/10/2014 6:29 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
Btw, Martin volunteered as release manager for the upcoming ruta release
if nobody objects.
Great!
If you keep some notes about what you find might be missing or confusing on our
web site's instructions for doing releases, you can improve our web site, too
:-).
One thing you'll need to get is an appropriate code signing key; instructions
for that are on our website.
-Marshall
Peter
Am 07.01.2014 19:08, schrieb Martin Toepfer:
+1 for "2.2.0" because there will be several improvements in the next
release.
Martin
+1 for 2nd digit. Last digit be minor features and bug fixes.
I usually update the 2nd digit by default when I do
releases and reserve the last digit for shoving in intermediate
maintenance revisions of the last release.
-- Richard
On 07.01.2014, at 13:17, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote:
+1 to having the 2nd digit increment if there are more than minor
changes,
especially if some of those changes might require some user action.
-Marshall
On 1/7/2014 5:13 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if the next version should be 2.2.0 instead of 2.1.1 since
the
new import syntax and functionality is not a small change and the
improvements in UIMA-2332 will maybe have a obvious impact for the
users.
Any opinions?
Peter
--
MSc. Martin Toepfer Raum: B008
Universität Würzburg Tel.: +49-(0)931-31-81856
Am Hubland Fax.: -
97074 Würzburg mail: [email protected]
www: http://www.is.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de/mitarbeiter/toepfer/
