On 1/10/2014 6:29 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: > Btw, Martin volunteered as release manager for the upcoming ruta release > if nobody objects.
Great! If you keep some notes about what you find might be missing or confusing on our web site's instructions for doing releases, you can improve our web site, too :-). One thing you'll need to get is an appropriate code signing key; instructions for that are on our website. -Marshall > > Peter > > Am 07.01.2014 19:08, schrieb Martin Toepfer: >> +1 for "2.2.0" because there will be several improvements in the next >> release. >> >>> Martin >>> +1 for 2nd digit. Last digit be minor features and bug fixes. >>> >>> I usually update the 2nd digit by default when I do >>> releases and reserve the last digit for shoving in intermediate >>> maintenance revisions of the last release. >>> >>> -- Richard >>> >>> On 07.01.2014, at 13:17, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 to having the 2nd digit increment if there are more than minor >>>> changes, >>>> especially if some of those changes might require some user action. >>>> >>>> -Marshall >>>> On 1/7/2014 5:13 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I wonder if the next version should be 2.2.0 instead of 2.1.1 since >>>>> the >>>>> new import syntax and functionality is not a small change and the >>>>> improvements in UIMA-2332 will maybe have a obvious impact for the >>>>> users. >>>>> >>>>> Any opinions? >>>>> >>>>> Peter >
