I think Marshall should decide if we need a third PMC vote or not. In case one is necessary, I volunteer to do one before next week.
-- Richard On 20.03.2014, at 15:39, Peter Klügl <[email protected]> wrote: > We have three votes and I assume that I can close the vote now. I will > actually do so and continue the release process if nobody objects in the > next 30 minutes or something. > > I just wanted to mention it, because we had a discussion about the > differences between committers and PMC members, and I actually stated > something wrong in that discussion. > > The page about voting [1] says: > > "Who is permitted to vote is, to some extent, a community-specific > thing. However, the basic rule is that only PMC members have binding > votes, and all others are either discouraged from voting (to keep the > noise down) or else have their votes considered of an indicative or > advisory nature only. > > That's the general rule. In actual fact, things tend to be a little > looser, and procedural votes from developers and committers are > sometimes considered binding if the voter has acquired enough merit and > respect in the community. Only votes by PMC members are considered > binding on code-modification issues, however." > > Our page about decisions [2] says: > > "All Contributors are encouraged to participate in decisions, but the > decision itself is made by those that have Committer status in the > Project. In other words, the Project is a " Minimum Threshold Meritocracy"." > "Any subscriber to the list may vote on any issue or action item. > However, the only binding votes are those cast by a Committer." > > Best, > > Peter > > [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > [2] http://uima.apache.org/decisions.html > > Am 20.03.2014 15:22, schrieb Alexandre Patry: >> - Compare soure.zip with svn - OK >> - mvn clean install from source - OK >> - Install plugin in eclipse - OK >> - Run a test using new IMPORT features in eclipse - OK >> >> [x] +1 OK to release >> >> >> Alexandre >> >> On 19/03/2014 09:53, Peter Klügl wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Am 19.03.2014 14:50, schrieb Alexandre Patry: >>>> Hi Peter, >>>> >>>> I tried to compile RUTA yesterday, but the build failed at the eclipse >>>> plugins. I once was able to compile everything, but I do not remember >>>> the exact maven configuration. Is there some documentation that I >>>> could look at? >>>> >>> mvn clean install on trunk should work just fine. >>> >>> What is the error message? >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Alexandre >>>> >>>> On 19/03/2014 05:26, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>>> Thanks Marshall! >>>>> >>>>> I will fix the RAT exclusions. I will take a look at the issuesFixed >>>>> differences. >>>>> >>>>> ... so we need one more vote *looking around* >>>>> >>>>> Peter >>>>> >>>>> Am 18.03.2014 16:09, schrieb Marshall Schor: >>>>>> compare source.zip with svn - OK >>>>>> >>>>>> good sig on source.zip >>>>>> >>>>>> build from source -OK (after clearing ruta* things from local repo) >>>>>> >>>>>> RAT excludes: has some redundancies I think (not a blocker): >>>>>> src/test/resource: >>>>>> org/apache/uima/ruta >>>>>> action/*.* and >>>>>> action/*ruta >>>>>> >>>>>> duplicate src/test/resources/org/apache/uima/ruta/engine/*txt >>>>>> >>>>>> License / notice checked in base and in some Jars - OK >>>>>> >>>>>> issueFixed - shows (only) 64 issues, but Jira shows 67 issues. >>>>>> This is due (I think) to 3 (missing) issues being marked "Done:", >>>>>> "Implemented", >>>>>> or "Cannot Reproduce" as their resolution status. Not a blocker, I >>>>>> think. >>>>>> >>>>>> installed plugins into Eclipse 4.3.2 , made new Ruta project - OK >>>>>> (Note: doc lists explicit versions of Eclipse, doesn't include 4.3.x >>>>>> (includes >>>>>> 4.2...) >>>>>> >>>>>> Looked at the staging repo for maven - OK >>>>>> >>>>>> [x] +1 OK to release >>>>>> >>>>>> -Marshall
