I updated the decisions.html page :-) to point to the ASF requirements for release voting.
-Marshall On 3/20/2014 2:18 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: > The Apache Software Foundation requires 3 or more votes by members of the PMC, > for a release. > > This is a foundation-wide requirement, see > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > > So, we need one more +1 vote by a PMC member. > > -Marshall > > On 3/20/2014 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >> We have three votes and I assume that I can close the vote now. I will >> actually do so and continue the release process if nobody objects in the >> next 30 minutes or something. >> >> I just wanted to mention it, because we had a discussion about the >> differences between committers and PMC members, and I actually stated >> something wrong in that discussion. >> >> The page about voting [1] says: >> >> "Who is permitted to vote is, to some extent, a community-specific >> thing. However, the basic rule is that only PMC members have binding >> votes, and all others are either discouraged from voting (to keep the >> noise down) or else have their votes considered of an indicative or >> advisory nature only. >> >> That's the general rule. In actual fact, things tend to be a little >> looser, and procedural votes from developers and committers are >> sometimes considered binding if the voter has acquired enough merit and >> respect in the community. Only votes by PMC members are considered >> binding on code-modification issues, however." >> >> Our page about decisions [2] says: >> >> "All Contributors are encouraged to participate in decisions, but the >> decision itself is made by those that have Committer status in the >> Project. In other words, the Project is a " Minimum Threshold Meritocracy"." >> "Any subscriber to the list may vote on any issue or action item. >> However, the only binding votes are those cast by a Committer." >> >> Best, >> >> Peter >> >> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >> [2] http://uima.apache.org/decisions.html >> >> Am 20.03.2014 15:22, schrieb Alexandre Patry: >>> - Compare soure.zip with svn - OK >>> - mvn clean install from source - OK >>> - Install plugin in eclipse - OK >>> - Run a test using new IMPORT features in eclipse - OK >>> >>> [x] +1 OK to release >>> >>> >>> Alexandre >>> >>> On 19/03/2014 09:53, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Am 19.03.2014 14:50, schrieb Alexandre Patry: >>>>> Hi Peter, >>>>> >>>>> I tried to compile RUTA yesterday, but the build failed at the eclipse >>>>> plugins. I once was able to compile everything, but I do not remember >>>>> the exact maven configuration. Is there some documentation that I >>>>> could look at? >>>>> >>>> mvn clean install on trunk should work just fine. >>>> >>>> What is the error message? >>>> >>>> Peter >>>> >>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Alexandre >>>>> >>>>> On 19/03/2014 05:26, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>>>> Thanks Marshall! >>>>>> >>>>>> I will fix the RAT exclusions. I will take a look at the issuesFixed >>>>>> differences. >>>>>> >>>>>> ... so we need one more vote *looking around* >>>>>> >>>>>> Peter >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 18.03.2014 16:09, schrieb Marshall Schor: >>>>>>> compare source.zip with svn - OK >>>>>>> >>>>>>> good sig on source.zip >>>>>>> >>>>>>> build from source -OK (after clearing ruta* things from local repo) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> RAT excludes: has some redundancies I think (not a blocker): >>>>>>> src/test/resource: >>>>>>> org/apache/uima/ruta >>>>>>> action/*.* and >>>>>>> action/*ruta >>>>>>> >>>>>>> duplicate src/test/resources/org/apache/uima/ruta/engine/*txt >>>>>>> >>>>>>> License / notice checked in base and in some Jars - OK >>>>>>> >>>>>>> issueFixed - shows (only) 64 issues, but Jira shows 67 issues. >>>>>>> This is due (I think) to 3 (missing) issues being marked "Done:", >>>>>>> "Implemented", >>>>>>> or "Cannot Reproduce" as their resolution status. Not a blocker, I >>>>>>> think. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> installed plugins into Eclipse 4.3.2 , made new Ruta project - OK >>>>>>> (Note: doc lists explicit versions of Eclipse, doesn't include 4.3.x >>>>>>> (includes >>>>>>> 4.2...) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Looked at the staging repo for maven - OK >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [x] +1 OK to release >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Marshall >>>>>>> >> > >
