Thanks :-)
Sorry, I got really confused yesterday.
Peter
Am 20.03.2014 19:18, schrieb Marshall Schor:
The Apache Software Foundation requires 3 or more votes by members of the PMC,
for a release.
This is a foundation-wide requirement, see
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
So, we need one more +1 vote by a PMC member.
-Marshall
On 3/20/2014 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
We have three votes and I assume that I can close the vote now. I will
actually do so and continue the release process if nobody objects in the
next 30 minutes or something.
I just wanted to mention it, because we had a discussion about the
differences between committers and PMC members, and I actually stated
something wrong in that discussion.
The page about voting [1] says:
"Who is permitted to vote is, to some extent, a community-specific
thing. However, the basic rule is that only PMC members have binding
votes, and all others are either discouraged from voting (to keep the
noise down) or else have their votes considered of an indicative or
advisory nature only.
That's the general rule. In actual fact, things tend to be a little
looser, and procedural votes from developers and committers are
sometimes considered binding if the voter has acquired enough merit and
respect in the community. Only votes by PMC members are considered
binding on code-modification issues, however."
Our page about decisions [2] says:
"All Contributors are encouraged to participate in decisions, but the
decision itself is made by those that have Committer status in the
Project. In other words, the Project is a " Minimum Threshold Meritocracy"."
"Any subscriber to the list may vote on any issue or action item.
However, the only binding votes are those cast by a Committer."
Best,
Peter
[1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
[2] http://uima.apache.org/decisions.html
Am 20.03.2014 15:22, schrieb Alexandre Patry:
- Compare soure.zip with svn - OK
- mvn clean install from source - OK
- Install plugin in eclipse - OK
- Run a test using new IMPORT features in eclipse - OK
[x] +1 OK to release
Alexandre
On 19/03/2014 09:53, Peter Klügl wrote:
Hi,
Am 19.03.2014 14:50, schrieb Alexandre Patry:
Hi Peter,
I tried to compile RUTA yesterday, but the build failed at the eclipse
plugins. I once was able to compile everything, but I do not remember
the exact maven configuration. Is there some documentation that I
could look at?
mvn clean install on trunk should work just fine.
What is the error message?
Peter
Thanks,
Alexandre
On 19/03/2014 05:26, Peter Klügl wrote:
Thanks Marshall!
I will fix the RAT exclusions. I will take a look at the issuesFixed
differences.
... so we need one more vote *looking around*
Peter
Am 18.03.2014 16:09, schrieb Marshall Schor:
compare source.zip with svn - OK
good sig on source.zip
build from source -OK (after clearing ruta* things from local repo)
RAT excludes: has some redundancies I think (not a blocker):
src/test/resource:
org/apache/uima/ruta
action/*.* and
action/*ruta
duplicate src/test/resources/org/apache/uima/ruta/engine/*txt
License / notice checked in base and in some Jars - OK
issueFixed - shows (only) 64 issues, but Jira shows 67 issues.
This is due (I think) to 3 (missing) issues being marked "Done:",
"Implemented",
or "Cannot Reproduce" as their resolution status. Not a blocker, I
think.
installed plugins into Eclipse 4.3.2 , made new Ruta project - OK
(Note: doc lists explicit versions of Eclipse, doesn't include 4.3.x
(includes
4.2...)
Looked at the staging repo for maven - OK
[x] +1 OK to release
-Marshall
