Checked source & binary signatures
Built from source
Built DUCC against that build
Installed DUCC and ran multiple UIMA-AS jobs using an http application
broker

[ ] +1 Approve the release


On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <[email protected]> wrote:

> Built from source - OK
> Spot checked signatures - OK
> Spot checked LICENSE and NOTICE - OK
> Checked UIMA-AS API formatting - OK
> Installed Deployment Editor in eclipse - OK
> Tested sending CASes to a service using HTTP and TCP - OK
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>
> Jerry
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > signatures OK
> > compare source-release with SVN -OK
> > eclipse plugin install - OK (in Eclipse 4.3.2)
> > build from sources after clearing local repo of uima-as artifacts: OK
> >
> > run extended tests:  bumpy but ok eventually.   I was running from
> Eclipse
> > and
> > my Eclipse doesn't quite do the right thing on building - it misses out
> > generating some xmlbean things (but build from command line with mvn
> > works).
> >
> > Also found a wrong version of Java compiler source / target in the poms,
> > need to
> > upgrade to parent-pom 10 (when that's released) and/or override in the
> > meanwhile.  This doesn't seem to have affect the build, when built with a
> > Java 7
> > JVM (which the Manifests indicate the binary build artifacts were built
> > with) -
> > the tests and extended tests both ran fine.  So I don't consider this a
> > blocker.
> >
> > issues fixed - OK
> >
> > Spot check many licenses & notices in Jars in the binary release
> > (especially the
> > new ones), and one in the Maven Artifacts in the staging repo: OK.
> >
> > check main license / notice in source and bin - OK
> >
> > Readme says "tested with Sun Java 6 on Windows XP"  - probably needs
> > updating?
> > I think we mainly test with Java 7 and on Windows we use Windows 7 (or
> 8),
> > not
> > XP...   I don't consider this a release blocker.
> >
> > Did the quickstart in the Readme - OK.
> >
> > [x] +1 OK to release.
> >
> > -Marshall Schor
> >
>

Reply via email to