Also checked LICENSE & NOTICE in binary distribution and after the build from source.
[ ] +1 Still approve the release On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Burn Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > Checked source & binary signatures > Built from source > Built DUCC against that build > Installed DUCC and ran multiple UIMA-AS jobs using an http application > broker > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Built from source - OK >> Spot checked signatures - OK >> Spot checked LICENSE and NOTICE - OK >> Checked UIMA-AS API formatting - OK >> Installed Deployment Editor in eclipse - OK >> Tested sending CASes to a service using HTTP and TCP - OK >> >> [ ] +1 Approve the release >> >> Jerry >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > signatures OK >> > compare source-release with SVN -OK >> > eclipse plugin install - OK (in Eclipse 4.3.2) >> > build from sources after clearing local repo of uima-as artifacts: OK >> > >> > run extended tests: bumpy but ok eventually. I was running from >> Eclipse >> > and >> > my Eclipse doesn't quite do the right thing on building - it misses out >> > generating some xmlbean things (but build from command line with mvn >> > works). >> > >> > Also found a wrong version of Java compiler source / target in the poms, >> > need to >> > upgrade to parent-pom 10 (when that's released) and/or override in the >> > meanwhile. This doesn't seem to have affect the build, when built with >> a >> > Java 7 >> > JVM (which the Manifests indicate the binary build artifacts were built >> > with) - >> > the tests and extended tests both ran fine. So I don't consider this a >> > blocker. >> > >> > issues fixed - OK >> > >> > Spot check many licenses & notices in Jars in the binary release >> > (especially the >> > new ones), and one in the Maven Artifacts in the staging repo: OK. >> > >> > check main license / notice in source and bin - OK >> > >> > Readme says "tested with Sun Java 6 on Windows XP" - probably needs >> > updating? >> > I think we mainly test with Java 7 and on Windows we use Windows 7 (or >> 8), >> > not >> > XP... I don't consider this a release blocker. >> > >> > Did the quickstart in the Readme - OK. >> > >> > [x] +1 OK to release. >> > >> > -Marshall Schor >> > >> > >
