The vote passes with 3 +1 votes and no other votes received: +1 votes received from: - Marshall Schor - Jaroslaw Cwiklik - Burn Lewis
No other votes were received. Thanks to all for taking the time to vote on the UIMA-AS release. I will promote UIMA-AS artifacts to the Central Repo. On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Burn Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > Also checked LICENSE & NOTICE in binary distribution and after the build > from source. > > [ ] +1 Still approve the release > > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Burn Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Checked source & binary signatures > > Built from source > > Built DUCC against that build > > Installed DUCC and ran multiple UIMA-AS jobs using an http application > > broker > > > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Built from source - OK > >> Spot checked signatures - OK > >> Spot checked LICENSE and NOTICE - OK > >> Checked UIMA-AS API formatting - OK > >> Installed Deployment Editor in eclipse - OK > >> Tested sending CASes to a service using HTTP and TCP - OK > >> > >> [ ] +1 Approve the release > >> > >> Jerry > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > signatures OK > >> > compare source-release with SVN -OK > >> > eclipse plugin install - OK (in Eclipse 4.3.2) > >> > build from sources after clearing local repo of uima-as artifacts: OK > >> > > >> > run extended tests: bumpy but ok eventually. I was running from > >> Eclipse > >> > and > >> > my Eclipse doesn't quite do the right thing on building - it misses > out > >> > generating some xmlbean things (but build from command line with mvn > >> > works). > >> > > >> > Also found a wrong version of Java compiler source / target in the > poms, > >> > need to > >> > upgrade to parent-pom 10 (when that's released) and/or override in the > >> > meanwhile. This doesn't seem to have affect the build, when built > with > >> a > >> > Java 7 > >> > JVM (which the Manifests indicate the binary build artifacts were > built > >> > with) - > >> > the tests and extended tests both ran fine. So I don't consider this > a > >> > blocker. > >> > > >> > issues fixed - OK > >> > > >> > Spot check many licenses & notices in Jars in the binary release > >> > (especially the > >> > new ones), and one in the Maven Artifacts in the staging repo: OK. > >> > > >> > check main license / notice in source and bin - OK > >> > > >> > Readme says "tested with Sun Java 6 on Windows XP" - probably needs > >> > updating? > >> > I think we mainly test with Java 7 and on Windows we use Windows 7 (or > >> 8), > >> > not > >> > XP... I don't consider this a release blocker. > >> > > >> > Did the quickstart in the Readme - OK. > >> > > >> > [x] +1 OK to release. > >> > > >> > -Marshall Schor > >> > > >> > > > > >
