what's the consequence of it not being found? Does it mean that the Javadocs for uima-as are bad, or is it of no consequence? -Marshall
On 12/9/2016 9:16 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote: > Could it be replaced with the uimaj-current link? Sure, needs RC3. > Is this serious enough to cancel? > > -jerry > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The build from sources has an error when building the distribution >> Javadocs: >> >> [WARNING] javadoc: warning - Error fetching URL: >> http://uima.apache.org/d/uimaj-2.9.0/apidocs/ >> >> This happens because the javadocs are now here >> http://uima.apache.org/d/uimaj-current/apidocs/ >> >> How important is this link to generating uima-as javadocs? Could it be >> replaced >> with the uimaj-current link? >> >> -Marshall >> >>
