Strange, this jira is assigned to 2 things UIMA-SDK and UIMA-AS Fix Version/s: 2.9.0SDK, 2.9.0AS
This should be legal. Looks like the maven plugin responsible for the jira report got confused. Wonder, had UIMA-AS been first in this list would this have worked? jerry On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: > signatures OK > compare source-release with svn - OK > build from source (after clearing .m2 of uima-as folders) > won't build with Java 8 and -Papache-release because of javadoc errors > OK with Java 7 > > installed from Eclipse update site location OK, > made an ae descriptor and a deployment descriptor that ref'd it. OK > > issues fixed - missing 4988 (not a blocker, I think, but would be good to > fix > our "procedure") > > README - OK > > RELEASE_NOTES - ok > > License and Notice OK > > spot check maven artifacts OK > > [X] +1 OK to release > > -Marshall Schor > > >
