Very since :-)
I'll also bet that the CAS creation is faster? There are no ThreadLocals
yet in the Ruta tests.
Am 13.01.2017 um 04:56 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> An interesting comparison: The Ruta-core tests, for 2.5.0, run (on my laptop
> develop machine) in 48 seconds. If I switch the Java to 8, it runs in 40
> seconds. If I switch to Uima v3, it runs in about 23 seconds :-).
> This amount of speedup is perhaps unusual; I haven't really analyzed what's
> contributing to the improvement. It could be many things, from better
> of reference, causing significantly fewer memory cache misses (this is a key
> design goal of v3), and/or benefits from improvements in some of the
> approaches for managing indexes.
> On 1/12/2017 10:50 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
>> I'm wondering how to do the version management for v3 style components.
>> what I did for testing:
>> 1) I made a version of uimaFIT and Ruta for v3, and called them by some
>> different version number. For instance, for uimaFIT, I started with
>> 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT (trunk) and made a 126.96.36.199-SNAPSHOT version. For Ruta, I
>> with the 2.5.0 (tag) and made a 188.8.131.52-SNAPSHOT version.
>> Having a separate version allows the builds to create separate sets of Maven
>> objects, which don't "overlay" the others.
>> The POM changes are:
>> a) switching the Java version to 8
>> b) depending on uima v3 (3.0.0-SNAPSHOT)
>> c) Ruta has a property for the uima version, the uimaFIT version, both
>> to the appropriate versions.
>> I'm not sure this is the best idea about version numbers. I suspect we will
>> maintaining two version streams for a while, so perhaps having a uniform
>> for Ruta and uimaFIT would be good. But it's also a bit of a pain to have
>> versions. I've managed to keep version 2.x and 3.x of UIMA more or less in
>> sync, using the svn "merge" command, which seems to work pretty well. Maybe
>> there's a better way though...
>> 2) A main change for using UIMA v3 is to have updated JCasGen classes. Ruta
>> some parts of uimaFIT use the maven plugin for JCasgen to generate the JCas
>> cover classes as part of the build. This is ideal; no "migration" is needed;
>> just run the build and the v3 versions of the JCas classes are generated.
>> uimaFIT has some JCas cover classes that are not generated by the build, but
>> in source code. It would be simpler if these could be also generated. If
>> is not possible (perhaps because they've been "customized"), they can be
>> converted using the migration tool. I did this for the uimaFIT classes that
>> were not generated by the build.
>> 3) Some test cases that depend on the internals of V2 needed updating in
>> 4) One test in Ruta creates pipelines in succession (using uimaFIT) and sees
>> the type system is != to a previous one as a signal initialize some Ruta
>> representations of types. In Version 3, equal type systems are consolidated,
>> and one of the tests had such, and so part of the Ruta initialization was
>> skipped, which caused an error.
>> 5) Some of the tests in Ruta using some internals of uima needed some
>> I'm planning on reviewing and checking in the uv3 changes tomorrow. I guess
>> need to figure out how to have a v3 version of uimaFIT / Ruta, either
>> temporarily in a branch, or some other way.