Please respond with a +1 or other for the decision to move uimaj to a writable
GIT repo, and
switch to using GIT for the source code control system for uimaj.

[X] +1 OK to move uimaj from SVN to (writable) GIT for source control

[ ]  0  don't care

[ ]  -1 not OK to move uimaj from SVN to (writable) GIT for source control
because...

-Marshall

On 8/19/2019 11:37 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's currently a Jira issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6115
> to do some svn work to merge the uimaj v2 and v3 repositories.
>
> Now that we have new versions of both uimaj v2 and v3 recently released, I'm
> thinking of skipping that Jira, and doing this instead:
>
> 1) converting the uima-uimaj existing git read-only-mirror repo to a git
> read/write repo.
>
> 2) once that happens, updating it by adding to it the data from the existing
> uima-uimaj-v3 existing git read-only-mirror, initially as a branch named 3.
>
> 3) renaming the master branch to the 2.x branch; renaming the 3.x branch to be
> master, to reflect that the main new dev work is in the 3.x stream.
>
> Does this sound reasonable?  Have I overlooked something important?
>
> -Marshall
>
>
>

Reply via email to