Please respond with a +1 or other for the decision to move uimaj to a writable GIT repo, and switch to using GIT for the source code control system for uimaj.
[X] +1 OK to move uimaj from SVN to (writable) GIT for source control [ ] 0 don't care [ ] -1 not OK to move uimaj from SVN to (writable) GIT for source control because... -Marshall On 8/19/2019 11:37 AM, Marshall Schor wrote: > Hi, > > There's currently a Jira issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6115 > to do some svn work to merge the uimaj v2 and v3 repositories. > > Now that we have new versions of both uimaj v2 and v3 recently released, I'm > thinking of skipping that Jira, and doing this instead: > > 1) converting the uima-uimaj existing git read-only-mirror repo to a git > read/write repo. > > 2) once that happens, updating it by adding to it the data from the existing > uima-uimaj-v3 existing git read-only-mirror, initially as a branch named 3. > > 3) renaming the master branch to the 2.x branch; renaming the 3.x branch to be > master, to reflect that the main new dev work is in the 3.x stream. > > Does this sound reasonable? Have I overlooked something important? > > -Marshall > > >