Hello JB, Good evening here from Europe :)
Thanks a lot for helping with all this JB ! I saw that you changed the version number already. Once you have the release staged let me know I’ll check it out. For Jenkins I believe I have an account on it already but possibly not enough access ? cheers, Serge… > On 7 déc. 2015, at 17:40, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Serge, > > good morning from the US ;) > > I already changed the version to 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT. > > I'm testing a build on my machine (and also preparing the Jenkins instance). > > If it works fine (and I bet it will ;)), I will stage the release. > > I keep you posted. > > Thanks, > Regards > JB > > On 12/07/2015 10:32 AM, Serge Huber wrote: >> Ok it seems we have consensus. We will change the version down to >> 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT >> >> JB would you have time to do this change and cut our first release ? >> >> Do we have everything we need to do this ? >> >> Let me know how I can help. >> >> cheers, >> Serge... >> >> Serge Huber >> CTO & Co-Founder >> T +41 22 361 3424 >> 9 route des Jeunes | 1227 Acacias | Switzerland >> jahia.com <http://jahia.com/> <http://www.jahia.com/ <http://www.jahia.com/>> >> SKYPE | LINKEDIN <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sergehuber >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sergehuber>> | TWITTER >> <https://twitter.com/sergehuber <https://twitter.com/sergehuber>> | VCARD >> <http://www.jahia.com/vcard/HuberSerge.vcf >> <http://www.jahia.com/vcard/HuberSerge.vcf>> >> >> >>> JOIN OUR COMMUNITY <http://www.jahia.com/ <http://www.jahia.com/>> to >>> evaluate, get trained and >> to discover why Jahia is a leading User Experience Platform (UXP) for >> Digital Transformation. >> >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> I would be more than happy to apply the change and cut off the release. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> >>> On 12/02/2015 10:27 AM, Serge Huber wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> As we are getting closer to a first release (yeah !), I’d like to propose >>>> something about the version number of Apache Unomi. >>>> >>>> Currently it is at 2.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT, which was mostly to >>>> differentiate from the 1.0.X version that we had outside of Apache, but I’m >>>> thinking more and more this doesn’t make much sense from the Apache point >>>> of view. >>>> >>>> I’d like to propose that we go to 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT and therefore >>>> our first release would be at 1.0.0-incubating. I’m not that found of 0.x >>>> numbers, especially since in my company we consider the current code as >>>> good enough for production environments, and I generally tend to think that >>>> if something can be used in production it should have a “major” version >>>> number. >>>> >>>> However this does beg the question of how do we map the Unomi version >>>> number to the CXS specification. As the specification is still evolving, I >>>> propose that we do something similar to what Apache Tomcat has done and >>>> provide a version mapping page such as this one : >>>> https://tomcat.apache.org/whichversion.html and that we can then freely >>>> perform releases of working and useful code and still map it to the spec as >>>> we want. >>>> >>>> What do you think ? >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Serge… >>>> >>>> ps : lazy consensus will apply here :) >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> [email protected] >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >> > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://blog.nanthrax.net <http://blog.nanthrax.net/> > Talend - http://www.talend.com <http://www.talend.com/>
