Dave, Agreed and I was not expecting you to send out something requesting RC4. However, you cannot simply say this is 1.0.0.RC4 but re-releasing at 1.0. You need to stage a release w/ the # 1.0 on it and then it can be voted on. You should vote on it as well within your PPMC.
John On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Dave <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:22 AM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Typically, for apache releases, each of these RC's would be voted on by > the > > PPMC and then the IPMC, assuming they're external releases. > > > > The Incubator Release page says we do a release vote on the PPMC mailing > list and then call for an Incubator PMC vote: > > "All releases by podlings must be approved by the TODO: link Incubator PMC. > The conventional process is for the podling to follow the usual Apache > process (including TODO: link release vote) and then call for a Incubator > PMC VOTE on the TODO: link general incubator list." > > Which makes sense because we don't want to waste everyones time on the > Incubator General release with release candidate files that are clearly not > ready for release. Instead we just waste our mentor's time ;-) > > - Dave > > > > > > > > I don't think you've marked RC4 as an external release, or any of the > > prior, so I don't think it's an issue. However, you must comply with the > > Apache Release process. Specifically, you need to create something > called > > 1.0 if that's what you're expecting to create. Please review [1] and [2] > > on the release process. > > > > - John > > > > [1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html > > [2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Dave <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:00 AM, John D. Ament <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi usergrid! > > > > > > > > It looks like this is your first release, right? It seems weird that > > you > > > > have something floating around called RC4 that was not released yet. > > > > > > > > > > As part of our release process we create a "release candidate" and our > > team > > > tests it, makes sure it meets all the criteria of the Incubator's > Podling > > > release checklist and then votes. > > > > > > We did that four times and finally arrived at release candidate 4 > (RC4), > > > which we voted to release. > > > > > > Once we pass the vote in the incubator, we will rename the release > files > > to > > > remove the "RC4" designation. > > > > > > - Dave > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > > From: Dave <[email protected]> > > > > Date: Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:51 AM > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating) > > > > To: "[email protected]" < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:43 AM, John D. Ament < > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > So... do you have a 1.0 artifact staged somewhere? I get that it's > a > > > > > rebuild of RC4, but I don't see that release referenced anywhere on > > > your > > > > > site. > > > > > > > > > > > > > The release files are here: > > > http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/usergrid/ > > > > > > > > - Dave > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Dave <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:00 AM, John D. Ament < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm a bit confused by your wording. Are you saying that this > is > > > 1.0 > > > > or > > > > > > > 1.0.0-rc4? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote is to release Apache Usergrid 1.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > - Dave > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
