Matthijs Lambooy wrote:
Well Jonathan gives me another good reason to use velocity

How is that a reason to use Velocity? I know you're trying to tell me off (and suck up to the people you feel are the relevant authority figures) but it's unsettling that there isn't even the slightest attempt at logical (or pseudological) discourse.

Summary: A dipshit writes a response to my private message in public and I tell him off and another self-righteous ass says I should be banned for telling him off.

And that's a "good reason" for you to use Velocity.

I mean, there's no logical connection anywhere. It's like:

"The socialists were just reelected in Spain."
"That's a good reason to use Velocity."
"Damn right."

Why don't you just say "Yer mommy wears army boots!" or something. At least it's something of an insult (at the primary school level anyway...)

Or really, try to make some technical argument in defense of how great Velocity supposedly is, we could talk about that...


Thanks Jonathan!!

You're welcome, I guess.... <shrug>

Oh, here are a couple more good reasons for people to use Velocity. The price of crude oil is at a record high. Pamela Anderson still has big tits.

Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/

Velocity or FreeMarker: Looking at 5 Years of Practical Experience
http://freemarker.blogspot.com/2007/12/velocity-of-freemarker-looking-at-5.html





Jonathan Revusky wrote:
Gonzalo Diethelm wrote:
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 18:21 +0100, Jonathan Revusky wrote:

Adrian, you little dipshit, ...


To the moderator of this forum: doesn't this language constitute grounds
for banning this person from these lists?

You seriously are proposing banning somebody (me in this instance) for calling somebody a dipshit? (Especially after the dipshit in question posted a private message to a public forum to try to embarrass that person?) And to make matters worse, the little dipshit told at least a couple of transparent lies afterwards to try to justify himself, like the bit about how I wrote some incredible rant to him in private that was so shocking, he'd never seen anything like this in 8 years... there's no generous interpretation of that, he was just lying....

So... schematically: a guy breaches nettiquette by posting a private message in public and subsequently tells lies about the incident, and you're going to ban not that individual, but the person at the receiving end who tells him off.

Anyway, nobody would believe that your grounds for banning me (calling the dipshit a dipshit) were the real grounds. They'd see me pointing out quite truthfully the state of this project and know perfectly well that that was the reason for the banning.

Jonathan Revusky



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to