Matthijs Lambooy wrote:
Well Jonathan gives me another good reason to use velocity
How is that a reason to use Velocity? I know you're trying to tell me
off (and suck up to the people you feel are the relevant authority
figures) but it's unsettling that there isn't even the slightest attempt
at logical (or pseudological) discourse.
Summary: A dipshit writes a response to my private message in public and
I tell him off and another self-righteous ass says I should be banned
for telling him off.
And that's a "good reason" for you to use Velocity.
I mean, there's no logical connection anywhere. It's like:
"The socialists were just reelected in Spain."
"That's a good reason to use Velocity."
"Damn right."
Why don't you just say "Yer mommy wears army boots!" or something. At
least it's something of an insult (at the primary school level anyway...)
Or really, try to make some technical argument in defense of how great
Velocity supposedly is, we could talk about that...
Thanks Jonathan!!
You're welcome, I guess.... <shrug>
Oh, here are a couple more good reasons for people to use Velocity. The
price of crude oil is at a record high. Pamela Anderson still has big tits.
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
Velocity or FreeMarker: Looking at 5 Years of Practical Experience
http://freemarker.blogspot.com/2007/12/velocity-of-freemarker-looking-at-5.html
Jonathan Revusky wrote:
Gonzalo Diethelm wrote:
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 18:21 +0100, Jonathan Revusky wrote:
Adrian, you little dipshit, ...
To the moderator of this forum: doesn't this language constitute grounds
for banning this person from these lists?
You seriously are proposing banning somebody (me in this instance) for
calling somebody a dipshit? (Especially after the dipshit in question
posted a private message to a public forum to try to embarrass that
person?) And to make matters worse, the little dipshit told at least a
couple of transparent lies afterwards to try to justify himself, like
the bit about how I wrote some incredible rant to him in private that
was so shocking, he'd never seen anything like this in 8 years...
there's no generous interpretation of that, he was just lying....
So... schematically: a guy breaches nettiquette by posting a private
message in public and subsequently tells lies about the incident, and
you're going to ban not that individual, but the person at the
receiving end who tells him off.
Anyway, nobody would believe that your grounds for banning me (calling
the dipshit a dipshit) were the real grounds. They'd see me pointing
out quite truthfully the state of this project and know perfectly well
that that was the reason for the banning.
Jonathan Revusky
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]