Kay Schenk wrote: > Assuming we can address Louis's concerns on this am, I vote we jstu go > with what you've got and see how the community at large feels. Trust me, > this is NOT going to be the end of this revision.
And Louis' changes are good in that they don't call for a major redesign. They are at the fine-tunning level, where they should be. > >So... I propose we fully develop the CVS 1.12 of my proposal until we > >can think of no more ways to ENHANCE it. We want a fine comb, not one > >that will require the changing of the web site altogether. > > Works for me! :) +1 > Currently, on the OOo site, there doesn't seem to be a clear delineation > here. I don't object to what we've got via navigation but maybe it would > be beneficial to attempt to define these two navigational approaches better. I don't think that's a priority. The vast majority of the site visitors are not regular team members. Hence, they have little to gain from that kind of delination. That kind of thing would benefit a corporate intranet better, where it's always the same people using the pages on a regular basis. Cheers, -- Daniel Carrera | I know everything, I just can't remember Join OOoAuthors today! | it all at once. http://www.oooauthors.org | :-) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
