Hi *, On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 08:37:27AM -0700, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: > >[...] > >Why go for JavaScript, sounds more like some server-side scripting > >task to me? > > The website application we use, called "SourceCast," is of a piece and > maintained by CollabNet. It is a proprietary application and our ability > to modify its elements limited. Having server-side scripting would be > very much desired for many things but they are not ours to have, at > least not right now.
<rant against SourceCast's Mail-Interface> Before you implement Server-Side Scripting in SourceCast - better replace eyebrowse with something useful. This is more important IMHO. Instead of replacing it, you could of course fix it to be useful as well (like let's say MHonArc). </rant> But to something more constructive: We (german-lang project) already use some rudimentary balancing. (We use a "random" (how random a machine can be) number to choose the server) See http://de.openoffice.org/downloads/quick.html http://de.openoffice.org/downloads/quickdl.js ciao Christian -- NP: Manowar - Kings Of Metal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
