On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 08:57:52 -0700, "Kay Schenk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > Of course. Kay is pretty qualified in this area but is still not an > > expert. Surely there are on this list expert javascript people? If > > not, we can leave that area as under development. > > Kay is knowledgeable, yes and no. I'm missing the point about JS I > guess. JS is not a "style" issue in my estimation. I think it might > difficult to come up with standards for thsi actually. JS is > programming basically, and depending on the knowledge level of the > implementor, this would be difficult (for me anyway) to come up with > standards on this. I'm not intending to address this.
I always thought style guide wasn't only about *style* specifically. It can be anything, like a guide to some web language. Many style guides are visual indeed but the word has many meanings. For instance, "something is a question of style". > I was thinking that the style guide could be come a generally useful > grab bag of web tricks. > This is how I understood it, too. > best, > Louis > Regards, Miikka Leskinen miles_fin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
