Hi André, thanks for the feedback. Some comments: > > - In the filebrowser and some IssueZilla pages, there is horizontal > > scrolling because the contents of the tables is too wide. The problem > > is that the header and footer are set to 100% width, and they do not > > extend to fill the extra horizontal space - any idea how this might be > > fixed? > > Can't reproduce.
This happens only on 1024x768 or lower resolutions. An example is http://website.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8814 - size the screen down and you will be able to reproduce the effect. > > > - The absolute positioning of the campaign ad won't work on 800x600 - > > it'll overlap with the action statements. There has to be a way to get > > #bodycol to take up 100% of the screen width - it's being done with > > the current homepage. Any suggestions? > > Why is that positioned absolutely...why not do a right float? > Or otherwise float the action statement block left, depending on which > one you want to have wrapped below. It is positioned absolutely because the table cell width that the action statements are contained in constrains the width to the screen width width minus 220 or so pixels. There must be a way to get that cell to take up 100% of the screen because it's being done on the current homepage. At the moment, on 1024x768, the width restriction forces the campaign ad to below the action statements div, and on larger displays, there would be over 220px between the campaign ad and the right side of the screen - the best way to see this is with Firefox's web developer extension, just click Outline and pick Tables (cells). As I understand it, the date for 2.4 has been pushed back so that will give us more time to test and fix the layout. - Ivan. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
