Same problem here
Mac OS 10.4 FF 3
navigator.userAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.4; cs; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070206 Firefox/3.0.1
navigator.platform: MacPPC
navigator.appVersion: 5.0 (Macintosh; cs)
navigator.javaEnabled(): true

window.onload...
Java version: 1.5.0_13
Java vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.


Immediate result...
Java version: 1.5.0_13
Java vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.
On Jul 28, 2008, at 10:09 AM, Juergen Schmidt wrote:

Hi Kay,

a short test on Mac OSX 10.5

Firefox
navigator.userAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070206 Firefox/3.0.1
navigator.platform: MacIntel
navigator.appVersion: 5.0 (Macintosh; en-US)
navigator.javaEnabled(): true

Immediate result...
Java version: 1.5.0_13
Java vendor: Apple Inc.


Safari
navigator.userAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_4; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Safari/525.20.1
navigator.platform: MacIntel
navigator.appVersion: 5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_4; en- us) AppleWebKit/525.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Safari/ 525.20.1
navigator.javaEnabled(): true

Immediate result...
Java version: null
Java vendor: null


But in the window below i got

window.onload...
Java version: 1.5.0_13
Java vendor: Apple Inc.


Juergen


Kay Schenk wrote:
Hello all--
Ok, here's another Java test page to try...yeah...it's goofy because I didn't take out the banner--see results in upper right hand corner and in page body. http://website.openoffice.org/tryouts/Kay/download/ appletDocWrite.html and yes, it does run an applet. My plans for using this are to NOT run the applet if the java version can be detected by other means (the browser supporting LiveConnect) but what I'm primarily interested in at this time is how well this procedure does at detection, generally. There are many issues with all of this, of course. Unfortunately, in some browsers the ONLY way to do java detection is through the applet method, and there's basically not a whole lot more that can be said here. The only browsers identified so far that need to go this route are Konqueror and older versions of IE (maybe 5?). The developer Eric Gerds and I have ben trying to nail down the quirks over the last day or so. The js I'm currently using is actually VERY slim compared to the original which had a lot of features we didn't need.
So...let me know.
I am particularly interested in what anyone who is currently using Firefox 3.0 on ANY platform gets. Odd mixed results on this one, though FF2 works fine! :/



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to